The power of the real name was Re: [HPforGrownups] Re: Voldemort = Lich?
finwitch
finwitch at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 13 23:38:56 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 60354
:
> Red Inkstone wrote
> >
> > At the same time, the idea that learning the true name of a being
> > confers power over it is hardly unique to the lich--it's the
reason
> > Moses isn't let in on the secret of the Divine Name, but is told
to
> > make do with the substitute moniker "I Am Who I Am" (=Yahweh) as
> > the "name" of the Deity who is talking to him.
(Izaskun)
> Well, don't forget Rumpelstiltskin.
I might add something that comes from Finnish folk tradition. One did
not speak the true name of a powerful being, lest he invited it (and
this practice gave birth to synonyms) - in Potter-books, this is
shown in the manner the wizards say you-know-who instead of
Voldemort, and how a basilisk's name (according to FB) truly DOES
this. (So, Hermione could NOT say it was a basilisk!)
However, knowing the "birth" of something gives some sort the power
over it. The sorcerer would then threaten to call upon the thing's
parents/ancestors...
erm- perhaps as the basilisk, being of rooster's egg, hatched by a
toad substitute to voice of a rooster(which is why possessed!Ginny
killed them all). However, this tradition would call upon TOADS being
able to fight effectively against basilisks on the virtue of being
toads! Dear Trevor is a FINE being!
-- Finwitch
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive