OOP - Possibly a *really* silly question about the prophecy
shelaghcol
ShelaghC at aol.com
Wed Jun 25 19:57:29 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 63819
I'll start out with a rather nonsensical sentence to use up spoiler
space along with throwing in some meaningless asterisks, pound signs
and other non-letter-related keyboard symbols.
@@@
###
~~~
***
+++
>>>
&&&
@@@
###
~~~
***
+++
>>>
&&&
Okay, that should be sufficient.
Since this was such a pivotal part of the plot and ultimately, was a
direct contributor to Sirius' demise, I'd like to throw this out to
the group for discussion.
As I ruminated over the previous books and what I consider their
biggest flaws (PS/SS - why even bother retaining the stone?; CoS -
Harry's refusal to talk about the parseltongue; PoA - possibly Lupin
forgetting to take the Wolfsbane draught?; GoF - why all that bother
on Barty Jr.'s part waiting all through the school year just to get
Harry into the graveyard where they could have portkeyed him easily
enough from the beginning of the year), I looked at the big picture
and came to this question:
Why the heck, when it was clear enough to those who knew just about
everything, but weren't imparting that knowledge to those who needed
to know, instead of placing a guard at the Department of Mysteries,
why didn't the Order just either move the bloody prophecy or destroy
it themselves instead of leaving it there for just anyone totally
naughty to find?
There certainly were enough people who belonged to the Order that
worked at the MoM to have arranged somehow to do such a thing. And
they certainly didn't *need* to have that particular prophecy
recorded if Dumbledore had been a witness to it.
And, just like the stone, they *knew* Voldemort was after it. Yet,
they left it there anyway.
So? Let us discuss.
Shelagh
encouraging a nice debate
(with many thanks to the mods for saving me from the need to recreate
this post)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive