OOP - another of them silly JKR loopholes
shelaghcol
ShelaghC at aol.com
Thu Jun 26 16:38:21 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 64335
The usual nonsensical sentence to use up spoiler space along with
throwing in some meaningless asterisks, pound signs and other non-
letter-related keyboard symbols.
@@@
###
~~~
***
+++
>>>
&&&
@@@
###
~~~
***
+++
>>>
&&&
And now, to begin.
According to Dumbledore, in order for Harry to be safe from
Voldemort, he must stay with his blood relative at least once a year.
Why the heck, then, was he forced to grow up 24/7, 365 days a year
with the worst muggles on the planet? Couldn't they have arranged
something even marginally better for him?
Yes, the argument could run that he was better off "growing up away
from all that" as Dumbledore said. But considering McGonagall's
initial assessment of the Dursleys and the fact that Dumbledore *had*
some contact with Petunia over the years, which would at least
suggest he had some knowledge of Harry's treatment at their hands,
why on earth would they leave the poor kid stashed away there?
It just seems as though they could have found a far more suitable
situation and arranged for Harry to have an annual visit with Petunia
rather than subject him all through his childhood to such a bleak and
dreadful upbringing.
Shelagh
throwing this bone in for discussion
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive