OOP: Dumbledore's actions (spoilers)
riki827
riki1229 at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 30 14:23:11 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 66033
S
P
O
I
L
E
R
I've been reading some posts about Dumbledore's "failure" with Harry
in OOP. I know some people are disappointed by it, but I have a
theory on Rowling's reasoning for it.
We've read many times how Dumbledore is the only wizard LV is afraid
of and how Dumbledore can protect Harry (which I believe means the
end of Dumbledore at some point, but that's a different post). With
Dumbledore making mistakes with Harry this time out, coupled with
Sirius's death, I believe this is Rowling's way of illustrating how,
as we grow up, we have to learn to take care of ourselves. Your
parents/guardians/keepers protect you as long as they can, and in the
best way they can, but at some point, protection time is over.
I think this goes along with the prophesy, and why some people may
have found it disappointing, at least dramatically so. Yes, WE knew
that Harry and LV were going to have to fight the final battle. But
Harry didn't. This is the same rite of passage lesson, I believe,
blown up into Harry-size proportions, of course. Ditto with Harry
seeing his father in a different (and disappointing) light. Those
people, those protectors, you think are perfect and infallible? They
fail you even though they have the best of intentions (Dumbledore),
they have flaws (James as seen in the pensieve), they're often
powerless (Harry has learned that he is the only one, as he
understands it at this point, who has the power to defeat LV), and
they die (James, Lily, Sirius).
It's a hard lesson to learn. But Rowling is into teaching us hard
lessons.
Riki
(proud newbie)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive