Harry and Hermione being siblings...

[Fred Waldrop]

No: HPFGUIDX 53520

 Taryn Kimel wrote: 
 
Actually, don't females have a few months after a birth when they 
can't become pregnant? Unless Diana Gabaldon has led me astray in her 
novels! ;) Correct me if I'm wrong, though.>
=================================================================
 
Julie Holmes wrote:
Not wrong per se, but all women are different. Breastfeeding often 
supresses a woman's fertility (i.e. supresses the menses); however, 
in countries likethe U.S. where breastfeeding a baby has hugely 
strayed from the ecological norm (the average age of weaning a child- 
worldwide - is four years; 
(snip) Even *exclusively* breastfeeding a baby through their infancy 
and continuinginto toddlerhood is not a guarantee against pregnancy. 
(snip)still be possible for Harry and Hermione to be siblings. Some 
of the Weasley children are close in age- Ron and Ginny, 
specifically, seem to be around 12 to 18 months apart,seeing as they 
are only a year apart in school. And what about Bill and Charlie? We 
don't know exactly how far apart they are. There seems to be two
years between Percy and the twins, and then between the twins and Ron.
 :) Julie
===================================================================

Hello all, Fred here,
Well, I have stated in the past that I believe H/H are brother & 
sister. And as far as having 2 children in 10 months, my older sister 
was born Jan.12, and I was born Oct.6 of the same year. So I really 
do believe it can be done, I am living proof.
But I feel I have a differing of opinion than others in here. Not 
only do I believe they are brother & sister, but I think they were 
born on the same day. That's right, I think they are twins. Maybe not 
identical twins, but twins all the same. 
And I think that is what took Hagrid so long to "deliver" Harry (the 
missing 24 hours), he had to stop off and "deliver" Harrys' twin 
sister, Hermione (was) Potter, (now) Granger. But this is just my 
opinion. 

Fred Waldrop