Harry and Hermione being siblings...
Calliope
julia at thequiltbug.com
Sun Mar 9 22:13:58 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 53523
> Hello all, Fred here,
> Well, I have stated in the past that I believe H/H are brother &
> sister. And as far as having 2 children in 10 months, my older sister
> was born Jan.12, and I was born Oct.6 of the same year. So I really
> do believe it can be done, I am living proof.
> But I feel I have a differing of opinion than others in here. Not
> only do I believe they are brother & sister, but I think they were
> born on the same day. That's right, I think they are twins. Maybe not
> identical twins, but twins all the same.
> And I think that is what took Hagrid so long to "deliver" Harry (the
> missing 24 hours), he had to stop off and "deliver" Harrys' twin
> sister, Hermione (was) Potter, (now) Granger. But this is just my
> opinion.
>
Me:
Now that "would" be interesting, wouldn't it? So what that they don't have the
same birthday. One or the other of their birthdates could be fudged (I say
Hermione's.)
I think, though, that if they were twins, Hermione would have been hidden at
birth, not at the time of Voldemort's defeat. Especially if there were a
prophecy that James Potter's child would defeat Voldemort...they'd want them
separated as much as possible. In addition, no one would know about her. If
she weren't "hidden" until the Potters died, then Sirius, Lupin, etc would know
about her, and they would have dropped *some* kind of hint by now.
Unless Lupin knew, and that's why he didn't let Hermione fight the boggart in
class, for the same reason he didn't let Harry fight it - he thought it would be
Voldemort.
I don't know if I'm for this theory yet, but it's interesting.
Calliope
(who thinks Hermione's exam boggart was NOT McGonagall, but rather dead!Harry or
dead!Ron.)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Calliopes_fics/
http://www.thedarkarts.org/authorLinks/Calliope/
http://www.riddikulus.org/authorLinks/Calliope/
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive