Slytherin Stereotypes WAS Re: [HPforGrownups] Re: Dumbledore's awarding ...
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Wed May 7 03:20:47 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 57187
I (Darrin) wrote:
> > Show me a case where a Slyth has done something decent and I
don't
> > count standing for Cedric.
> >
> > The entire school stood up, almost reflexively, BEFORE they found
out
> > Voldemort was behind it, at which point Draco and many others
started
> > showing their true colors.
> >
> > I wonder how many would have stood had Dumbledore started
> > with "Voldemort is back and he killed Cedric Diggory."?
> >
> > Besides, as I say in another post, so long as the Slyths follow
> > Draco, and fail to rein him in, they ARE tainted in some ways.
> >
> > So far, Snape is the exception and Draco is the rule. When that
is
> > overturned by future canon, I'll reconsider.
> >
> > Darrin
> > -- Rather invite a werewolf to dinner than a Slytherin
>
Oryomai wrote"
> I hate to bring up this argument again, but seeing as how we played
the
> "Attack Snape" game, I will. If you were a Slytherin and you saw
the
> Headmaster openly supporting Gryffindor over you, what would you
do? I might
> just be a bad person, but I would say "Screw it. I'm gonna do
exactly what
> they think I will. There's no way to change their point of view."
HRH
> *always* assume it's a Slytherin. Slytherin is kinda the Red
Herring (Scooby
> Doo anyone? :) ) And all of you listies who clearly say there are
no good
> Slytherins show that that stereotype exists. How can they show
themselves if
> you won't give them a chance? And there I go talking about HP like
it's
> really real again....
>
Now me:
Funny, I didn't see an example of a good Slytherin deed in that.
Just a justification that because the Headmaster actually decided
that bravery, honor, intelligence and self-sacrifice (Please, tell me
that Draco would have sacrificed himself on the chess board for
anyone -- I had a tooth pulled today and I need a laugh) was worth
something more than skulking about, using trickery to cost another
house points, it's OK to be nasty.
And when have I ever said I won't give Slytherin a chance? I have
repeatedly said that canon SO FAR has not given us a decent
Slytherin. I refuse to call them something other than nasty little
brats, based on the facts so far.
We might very well get that decent Slyth, or even more than one, in
the next three books. If so, I'll change my tune. But not until then.
The closest we've come is Snape, who has apparently committed to the
side of the angels and he also apparently believes that justifies him
making life miserable for HRH.
As an aside, am I the only one who still thinks it's possible he
could double-cross D-Dore and go to V-Mort? Someone that will turn
for you will turn against you, you know.
Tom wrote about the difference between Pansy "simpering" and the Trio
visiting each other.
I looked up the word "simper" and the AOL dictionary has it as "to
smile in a silly manner." That is just a weird word choice there. I'm
not sure why you would smile in a silly manner when you're trying to
show concern over an "injury."
Anyway, that is an odd way to put it.
As for the Ron as Keeper concerns:
My guess is that, at least for the first game, Ron is going to really
suck as a Keeper, maybe even costing them the game. If Harry is
captain, he'll be under pressure to replace Ron.
Darrin
-- Anxiously waiting the decent Slytherin, but my empty tooth socket
hurts and I'm going to bed.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive