[HPforGrownups] Time Travel Paradoces and Adopted!harry...

[Koticzka]

No: HPFGUIDX 58014

Was Buckbeak killed at first in PoA? I had an impression he was actually decapitated. And afterwards the deer appears.

Note: If time traveling works consequently - Hippogriff should be dead and there should be no deer at the first version of events.
OR Hippogriff should be spared nad deer should appear.
Another mistake? - I suppose so. But I have to check it up

Anyway travelling to the past once used does change events. According to some samples given by JKR people rather go through the time already changed, not live in the parallel space TWICE. So traveling in time works like this: I go through time and see the deer - where is it from? Afterwards I use time turner and get back in time and send Deer The Patronus, I already saw. Whatever I did in my future (wow, what a wire sentence...) is an objective past.

From: asandhp
Subject: [HPforGrownups] Adopted!Harry is Really.. TTTR
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 10:48 AM
>>The only conclusion worthy of HP would be for Harry to be Voldemort himself. Not his son or father or brother; that is Star Wars. Harry is Tom Riddle, time-turned to the 1980's as an infant and adopted by Lily and James.<<

***Koticzka's comment: In this case the seventh book would be called Tom
Riddle and the Chamber of Secrets - The Repetitory or New Begining
To make consequences crystal - the series would have to finish on the sixth
book if it is to describe the sixth year of Harry in Hogwarts'9x. The last
year the Boy-Who-Lived would spent in Hogwarts'4x - fifty years earlier
(where is the cannon???? - smirk)...

By the way - if V. would intend to kill Harry traveling back in time he (who? - I got lost!) must know he had not succeed and be defeated. Because it actually happened! Any hope for success is a proof of naivety if not stupidity.
It is as if there was time of time, another continuity of consequences which cannot be manipulated.

One point confuses me there: the decision is being made afterwards. But you will not resign, because you have already decided. So we live in the past, even when the future is actually to happen. If Ms. JKR solved this problem, she should be granted the Nobel Prize (not that I am that intelligent, but it is pradoxus which confuse some bright Muggle minds) ;)

Another explanation - time travelling is for fools, who believe they can change what was already changed and/or established. Please, note that I mean time traveling not consideration of the consequences - before anyone felt insulted (the insulted group would have to include me, as I consider TT pretty often!)

Best regards
Ethernal Koticzka
How can you hurt a man who has nothing? 
Give him something broken.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]