Fawkes = Traitor?

[M.Clifford]

No: HPFGUIDX 58172

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, The Entwife <maialaia at y...> 
wrote:
> 
> > --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "angelfish302"
> > <sfischer at h...> 
> > wrote:
> > > Considering JKR's use of meaningful names
> > (Voldemort, Draco, 
> > > Narcissa, etc.), will Fawkes become a traitor like
> > his namesake?
> > > 
> > > --Angelfish
> 
> 
> Well if you subscribe to the theory, which many do,
> that Dumbledore is actually a bad guy, then would
> Fawkes really count as a "traitor?"
> 
> After all we're told he responds to "loyalty" not
> goodness, courage or whathaveyou....
> 
> ~Squee
> 
Valky:

Not really sure about what Fawkes leaning is in good or evil.
I do have an observation to offer though that some might find 
interesting in this topic.

Why is Fawkes at Hogwarts?

We are assuming that he is Dumbledores pet, as Harry has. Yet I don't 
recall Dumbledore saying "Fawkes is mine.". 

Does Fawkes belong to Harry? 

Lets consider some things that may support this theory. 

1 Fawkes heals Harry which could be a display of Loyalty to Harry.

2 Dumbledore has on other occassions had *Treasure* belonging to 
other Wizards left in his keeping, including Harry's cloak. Could 
Fawkes be a Potter Treasure.

As I write I am thinking of a dozen arguments against the theory so I 
will leave it at that and ask. What do you think?

Valky