[HPforGrownups] Questioning the Lexicon yet again: Lucius Malfoy

MadameSSnape at aol.com MadameSSnape at aol.com
Wed Nov 12 00:51:29 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 84712

In a message dated 11/11/2003 7:44:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
nkittyhawk97 at yahoo.com writes:
Alright. Since all of this 'contamination' I've decided just to rely 
on my own timelines that I've drawn out for myself.
But, if I see something that I think is wrong, I feel I have to 
point it out. If you look at the Lexicon timeline with all the 
Hogwarts students and when they were students it shows Lucius Malfoy 
as being older (exceptionally older) than the Marauders. Where's the 
canon proof of that? (also regarding the fact that he has a son the 
same age as James's son)
___nittyhawk (who is addicted to quotes) 


Sherrie here:

Lucius' age is given in OotP - in the article regarding Umbridge's 
appointment as High Inquisitor, IIRC.  He's listed as 41 at that time.  In an interview 
given around the time of the release of GoF, JKR states that Snape (& by 
extension the Marauders) is 35 or 36 at that point.  Therefore, there is a 5 or 6 
year age difference between the two.

If they were the same age, I think Harry would have marked Lucius' presence 
in the OWL hall.

Sherrie


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





More information about the HPforGrownups archive