[HPforGrownups] Questioning the Lexicon yet again: Lucius Malfoy
MadameSSnape at aol.com
MadameSSnape at aol.com
Wed Nov 12 00:51:29 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 84712
In a message dated 11/11/2003 7:44:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
nkittyhawk97 at yahoo.com writes:
Alright. Since all of this 'contamination' I've decided just to rely
on my own timelines that I've drawn out for myself.
But, if I see something that I think is wrong, I feel I have to
point it out. If you look at the Lexicon timeline with all the
Hogwarts students and when they were students it shows Lucius Malfoy
as being older (exceptionally older) than the Marauders. Where's the
canon proof of that? (also regarding the fact that he has a son the
same age as James's son)
___nittyhawk (who is addicted to quotes)
Sherrie here:
Lucius' age is given in OotP - in the article regarding Umbridge's
appointment as High Inquisitor, IIRC. He's listed as 41 at that time. In an interview
given around the time of the release of GoF, JKR states that Snape (& by
extension the Marauders) is 35 or 36 at that point. Therefore, there is a 5 or 6
year age difference between the two.
If they were the same age, I think Harry would have marked Lucius' presence
in the OWL hall.
Sherrie
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive