[HPforGrownups] Re: Ogg the Gamekeeper
nymphadoraotonks at aol.com
nymphadoraotonks at aol.com
Wed Nov 12 21:23:09 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 84846
justcarol67 at yahoo.com wrote:
è Sorry I didn't check the back posts. I'm a bit pressed
è for time. I still think it would be strange for Molly to be
è about 65 as the Ogg connection suggests. The
è descriptions of her make her sound middle-aged, say
è 45, and as I said before, unless there's something
è more to her character than we know about, she seems
è like the type who would marry early, and, as I didn't
è say, have a child about every 18 months to two years.
è (I like Molly. Please don't take this as criticism.) the
è only explanation I can think of that would reconcile
è Molly as we've seen her with Molly as a woman older
è than Voldemort is the idea that witches and wizards
è live longer, and by extension age more slowly, than
è muggles. JKR said in an interview that Dumbledore
è (who seems about 85) is 150 and MacGonagall (who
è seems about 55) is "a sprightly 70). If anyone can
è come up with a better explanation, I'd like to hear it.
è (Maybe you could just refer me to a particularly
è enlightening back post.)
I think you are getting to what I meant to state, <grin>.Wizards do live much
longer than muggles so at around sixty-five, Molly would be middle aged. But,
as for her marrying early, maybe she did. JKR hasn't explained what she did
before marriage or how anything in her life would have been pre-weasley
children. There is also a possibility as with many women that she could have
miscarried children before having Bill. ( That is strictly a theory to explain time
lost)
-Tonks
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive