Voldemort's animus toward the Potters/the prophecy (was Replay)
erinellii
erinellii at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 24 14:25:21 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 85775
> Kathy:
> "Merely taking your life would not satisfy me, I admit.." Does
> anyone believe Dumbledore couldn't have killed Tom if he wanted
>to?
<snip>
Erin:
Actually, yes. I believe that had Dumbledore attempted to AK
Voldemort, he would have failed through some circumstance he could
not have forseen. Much as Voldemort failed when attempting to kill
Harry as a baby. I'm not saying that Voldemort's mother's love would
have saved him, of course. But something would have happened to
prevent Dumbledore, and it might have been every bit as disastrous
for DD as the failed AK was for Voldy.
Why? Because of the prophecy. It foretold that the Dark Lord would
mark Harry, and so that was what happened. It fortells that only
Harry (or, all right, possibly Neville) can kill LV, and I believe
it.
And so, I think, does Dumbledore. Do you seriously believe that if
he could have killed LV right then, he wouldn't have? Sure, he
tells LV it's because it wouldn't satisfy him... but I think that
pure relief would outweigh that unsatisfied feeling. He's not
capable, and he knows it. The reason for the remark is that he
doesn't want LV to know it.
Erin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive