Guilty Again (Was Death chamber/ancient magic)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Thu Oct 2 00:04:32 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 82043
Talisman writes:
>>Pettigrew had been LV's spy for over a year. (PoA 374) The
Godric's Hollow attack occurred "barely a week after the Fidelius
Charm had been performed [on Sirius]," (PoA 205), therefore
likely only days after the "switch" to Pettigrew. Pettigrew ran
straight to his master.
>
> Everyone knew there was a spy in the Order (e.g. PoA 375) I do
not believe Pettigrew could have fooled DD for a year. <<
Maybe it was Lupin <g> But in any case this does not take
Occlumency into account. Snape tells us that a skilled
Occlumens can not only block Legillimency, he can do it so that
the Legillimens does not know he is being blocked.
That would explain how Snape could fool Voldemort, and it also
explains how a succession of Dark Wizards, from Pettigrew to
Fake!Moody, could fool Dumbledore. Legillimency breeds a
certain over-confidence in its practitioners, and Voldemort is not
the only victim. Note that Harry, who seems to be a natural
Legillimens (is *that* the significance of Lily's eyes?) thinks he
can tell who the wrong sort are for himself, but is fooled by the
same people who can fool Dumbledore.
It would be folly for Voldemort to send anyone to spy on close
friends of Dumbledore who was not a skilled Occlumens.
Pettigrew knows that Dumbledore is looking for the spy. He
also knows that his three friends are hiding the secret that he is
an illegal animagus and was running around Hogwarts with a
werewolf. I don't think Peter would have felt very safe if there was
a chance that Dumbledore would discover all this in his friends'
minds. So I argue that all the Marauders must have been
Occlumenses, (Occlumentes?), and that they accquired this skill
when they were studying to become Animagi.
We've long wondered about Dumbledore's verbal arabesque,
"not least keeping it from me" (quoting PoA from memory) when
he talks to Harry about Sirius being an Animagus. Pip!Squeak
speculates that it means that Dumbledore *did* know about the
Animagi. But I think what we are hearing is Dumbledore skating
around the thin ice of Occlumency; a subject he very much
wanted to avoid. Guilty, indeed, but only of being overprotective.
It would appear that for an Occlumens to conceal a falsehood
successfully, as Snape can, he would have to be able not only to
lie convincingly, but to block the memory of having lied as well.
But does a Legillimens detect a lie when someone tells the
truth in fact but not in essence? Evidently not.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive