Why Arthur & Molly were not in the Order the first time around
jwcpgh
jwcpgh at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 25 15:11:53 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 83553
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "theultimatesen"
<senderellabrat at a...> wrote:
<snip>I figure it's pretty obvious why they weren't in the order.
Their hands were tied up with the babies. First priority at that
time.
Laura:
Sorry, not buying. Having young children didn't stop the Potters or
the Longbottoms from being active Order members-I know the Weasleys
had a bunch more than either of those couples but still. There were
tasks to be done for the Order that didn't necessarily involve
imminent danger. That's what Arthur is doing a lot of now-gathering
info from within the MOM.
Anyhow, not being in the Order didn't mean you were safe from LV-and
we know that the Weasleys have a reputation for not taking their
pureblood status too seriously.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive