Inside Dumbledore's Head (was Re: Prophets without Honour)
mochajava13
mochajava13 at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 3 09:27:17 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 79660
Kneasy:
To go back to the chess analogy, Harry is a pawn, maybe a knight,
no more. DD is the player. He will sacrifice a knight, if he has to.
Now Sarah:
Wow, I never thought about the chess analogy before, but this fits.
And look at all the talk of chess we have in the books! I agree
almost 100 percent, except for this: Harry is the king of a chess
game. He can't be sacrificed, because if he is, the game is lost.
The other side (here, Voldemort and his pure-blood only mania) has
won. We now know Dumbledore's view about Trelawney's prophecy: he
thinks that Harry, and Harry alone, has the power to defeat
Voldemort. Only Harry can destroy Voldemort, and vice versa. Kings
of a chess game: capture the opponents king, and the game is won.
If Harry gets captured, all is lost.
By the way, Dumbledore's not the oldest wizard we've encountered in
the books: one of the OWL testers comments that he (or was it a
she?) tested Dumbledore for Dumbledore's transfiguration NEWT.
Dumbledore might be sippig on some elixir of life, but he is the age
he appears to be.
Sarah
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive