Inside Dumbledore's Head (was Re: Prophets without Honour)

mochajava13 mochajava13 at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 3 09:27:17 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 79660

Kneasy:
To go back to the chess analogy, Harry is a pawn, maybe a knight,
no more. DD is the player. He will sacrifice a knight, if he has to.

Now Sarah:
Wow, I never thought about the chess analogy before, but this fits.  
And look at all the talk of chess we have in the books!  I agree 
almost 100 percent, except for this: Harry is the king of a chess 
game.  He can't be sacrificed, because if he is, the game is lost.  
The other side (here, Voldemort and his pure-blood only mania) has 
won.  We now know Dumbledore's view about Trelawney's prophecy: he 
thinks that Harry, and Harry alone, has the power to defeat 
Voldemort.  Only Harry can destroy Voldemort, and vice versa.  Kings 
of a chess game: capture the opponents king, and the game is won.  
If Harry gets captured, all is lost.

By the way, Dumbledore's not the oldest wizard we've encountered in 
the books: one of the OWL testers comments that he (or was it a 
she?) tested Dumbledore for Dumbledore's transfiguration NEWT.  
Dumbledore might be sippig on some elixir of life, but he is the age 
he appears to be.  

Sarah






More information about the HPforGrownups archive