Disliking the next to die

[naamagatus]

No: HPFGUIDX 95904

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "nkafkafi" <nkafkafi at y...> 
wrote:
> > Naama wrote:
> > I actually predict a twin dying (George, I'm afraid, is toast). 
> This 
> > is because it covers the required Weasley death, makes for a 
heart 
> > breaking tragedy, but doesn't really leave structural holes, so 
to 
> > speak, in the story. Our hearts will go out to poor old Fred, but 
> > after all - do we *really* need two of them? 
> 
> Neri:
> I must have missed something, but why George and not Fred?

No, you haven't missed something. It's a purely personal impression 
of mine, that George is somehow less important, more vague as a 
character, than Fred. Since JKR has everything planned ahead, 
certainly the death of a Weasley, then it makes psychological sense 
that she would, unconsciously even, invest less in him.

Naama