biggest SPOILER _ Children's Books?

[Josh Warren]

No: HPFGUIDX 109929

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "cubfanbudwoman" 
<susiequsie23 at s...> wrote:
> Josh Warren wrote:
> > > I tend to get a bit testy when already-denied 
> > > theories keep managing to pop up.
> 
> 
> SSSusan:
> The thing is, as much as I *don't* believe in Vampire!Snape, there 
> are still folks who can hang onto that theory because what JKR said 
> to "Is there a link between Snape and vampires?" was "Erm...I don't 
> think so."  You see?  It sounded like a "no" to me, but why doesn't 
> she just come out and say "NO!" It's the way she leaves a teeny 
> tiny window there that muddies the waters.

She has 4 answers... "yes" "no" "I can't say!" and "what are you, 
stupid?"

I'll count her Vampire!Snape answer as #4, right along with DE!Lily, 
Granddaddy!LV, etc. ;-)

> Josh:
> > > BTW, is anyone else upset that the latest FAQ poll on her 
> > > website is overwhelmingly favoring what "my last" meant over 
> > > Undercover!Percy and MIA!Wormtail? *sigh* damned kids.
>  
> SSSusan:
> Well, this "kid" [kinda funny in that I'm 42] voted for "my last." 
> So sue me. :-)  

*rolls eyes* ;) Let's have our lawyers exchange contact info ;) hee 
hee... Seriously though... even if "my last" doesn't refer to the 
original letter from Nov 1, then it is next most likely to be a 
similar warning. Somehow I doubt that as nothing seems to have ever 
been said to the Dursleys to correct their behaviour before OotP, its 
instances being the Howler and the welcoming committee. :)

We'll find out about Peter soon enough, but the possibility of DE!
Percy is what interests me. We know the Dursleys are stupid, and we 
know Peter is evil but indebted to Harry in some way (didn't help in 
GoF) and most likely was either spying as a rat or home licking LV's 
snakeskin boots, but Percy is an unknown and very troublesome, as 
Prat!Percy could become DE!Percy (and pretend to come home), but 
Undercover!Percy is safe to come back.

Josh