Hermione using the time turner in POA

[DawnnieC]

No: HPFGUIDX 111510


Hi – been lurking for a bit, finally decided to join in.  

 

**Waves to entire list**

 

Vmonte writes:

Is it possible that 17/18-year-old Harry is killed at GH but then brought back to the present and revived by Snape? Did he put a stopper on Harry's death? Is this the reason why there is a 24-hour time gap between the events of GH and when baby Harry is dropped off?  Is the house at GH destroyed because Harry and Voldemort's wand will meet up together again?

 

 

Dawnnie (me) response:

That’s an interesting theory, but it doesn’t sit quite “right” for me mainly because of Dumbledore’s warnings to Harry and Hermione when they attempt to rescue Sirus and Buckbeak.

 

>From Chapt 21 PoA:

“But remember this both of you: you must not be seen.  Miss Grainger, you know the law – you know what is at stake . . . . you – must – not – be – seen.”

 

Granted that Dumbledore was speaking of the possibility of “current” Harry and Hermione meeting “future” Harry and Hermione (or indeed anyone else out of the proper time line) and its implied disastrous effect on the time continuum.  Could not one extrapolate that such a warning/consequence if the time-turner was used to “undo” Harry’s death?

 

Yes, I know Harry and Hermione went back to “undo” Buckbeak’s death, but did they really?  Was Buckbeak really excuted?  Recall that none of Harry, Hermione, or Ron witnessed the execution. 

 

**shrug**

 

Just something that’s been tickling my brain a bit.

 

 ~ ~ Dawnnie otherwise known as Bug ~ ~



		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]