JKR's Messages (was Re: Hermione In Trouble?)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 29 23:47:59 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 120730
Alla wrote previously:
and in Marietta's case it is arguable whether she deserved the
punishment or not. (I'd say she did not deserve such harsh
punishment, but what she did was quite bad
too).
Neil:
I'd be interested in what type of punishment you would think
appropriate. Remember, Umbridge most likely would have expelled
every member of the DA if she had been able to prove they were
having meetings. Marietta didn't care what happened to any of the
members including Cho who was supposedly her friend.
Marietta was not forced to attend the meetings. She could have quit
after the meeting in Hogsmeade. There was no punishment for leaving
the group. Somehow I feel that if Cho had been expelled, she would
not have been nearly as fast to defend Marietta nor would she have
considered what Hermione did as cruel.
Alla:
I don't think that you read any of my posts about Marietta's
situation in the past. :o)
I DON'T defend her. I absolutely agree with you that she did not show
any loyalty to her friends who all could have been expelled because
of her betrayal, BUT Marietta's mother was Ministry employee and it
is reasonable to think that girl did have some conflicting loyalties.
What punishment would have been more appropriate? Frankly, I am OK
with this one. What I am not sure if I am OK with or not is that
Hermione did not WARN the group what is going to happen to someone
who will betray them.
Theoretically, if Marietta knew what is going to happen she would not
sign in the first place.
Although you can argue that if Marietta was not sure about the cause
from the beginning, she had not business coming to DA meeting in the
first place and here I would agree with you.
Just my opinion,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive