Dumbledore to be trusted?

[arrowsmithbt]

No: HPFGUIDX 105026

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Maren Gest" <mietoesarepink at c...> wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that Dumbledore seems to never be around when somethings 
happening with Harry and Voldemort (The first book he was called away on importaint 
duties, the second the govenors sent him away, and the fourth he wasn't there for the 
graveyeard part) The 5th book is the only one with Voldemort in it that Dumbledore was 
there to help, but it wasn't until he very end did he intervine. I think its possible that 
Dumbledore is not really as good as we think he is. Also how is it possible for Dumbledore 
not to catch that Pro. Moody in book four is not the real Moody? Even in the Penisive 
Dumbledore seems to be some what friends with the old man, and they have known each 
other for a long time. Mr.Weasley even says Dumbledore never miss' a trick, so how is it 
possible that he wasn't able to tell a good friend was an imposter, Fake Moody couldn't 
have been that good of an imposter?!
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

He has his own agenda all right. That damn plan of his.
What is it? He  seems to have  confided in no-one - why?
Many posters have been driven to distraction trying to untangle DD's motives.
I've previously wondered if he somehow  has prior knowledge of significant
events in the life and times of Harry Potter (79455, 79546). That whole thread
("Inside Dumbledore's Head") is well worth perusing.

You might enjoy 65696 "FLOOZY No.1 The Dumbledore Papers" if you
like a lighter  touch. If you really want to  get down and dirty then
MAGICDISHWASHER and its offshoots are the ones to savour.

But what  we all want is for some-one to take these old threads, give
'em a good shaking and hopefully come up with a fresh  insight.
Go  to  it!

Kneasy