The sounds of the Last post WAS ( Re:James the Berk? )
M.Clifford
Aisbelmon at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 12 15:04:36 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 105780
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "delwynmarch"
<delwynmarch at y...> wrote:
>
> Valky wrote :
> > It was a Dark Arts Curse, Snape was serious in battle with
James, deadly serious.
> >
Del wrote:
> "You know, Valky, we still haven't got a definition of what
> constitutes Dark Magic."
> >
Valky:
> Why, it's obvious, isn't it ? Anything Snape uses at that time
IS Dark Magic, that was his preferred style then, right?" ;D
>
Del: "You know, Valky, I studied Physics in University, which means
that I had to do a good deal of Maths, which are a thoroughly
logical field where you have to justify every single deduction you
make. An argument like yours would have been shot down in no time :
Snape liked Dark Magic, so he would preferably use Dark Magic, so
whatever he used had to be Dark Magic. It's so full of holes that it
would probably give a heart attack to some Maths teachers :-)"
>
Valky:(absolutely rolling on the floor)
REALLY! So do I! Small world huh, no wonder your debate style is so
appealing to me.
Oh and I deduce that you meant both are a thoroughly logical field,
yes? ;D
Of course it's full of holes! You backed me into the proverbial
corner with your post. I just threw one at you to save my neck.
It's not all that bad, really. You said yourself he knew more curses
than most 7th years. If he was that well versed in them *logically*
one of those would be the most infallible attacks he could throw at
James, since they were above James' level. Rationally, doing so
could have made the fight more winnable for Snape. So it's likely.
And that's, an argument, *not* full of holes.
LOL
By the Way, at this point I had better explain my title for this
post. Unfortunately for me, my next semester has started, and though
I am having the time of my life here, I must herald the piper and be
on my way. To the degree that I simply won't have so much time to
put the same amount of soul into this debate for now.
Besides which, I truly believe that we have already both argued
exceptional cases in the affirmative and negative for now and sadly
I must admit there comes a time when the debate must be left to the
judgement of it's audience.
So with the exception of whatever you need to say in closing Del, I
suggest we retire the debate, as of this post.
Now, back to the highwire for me for my final (and hopefully worthy
of my opponent) round.
> Del :
> Well, let's agree to disagree then, because in my mind he was
> entitled to use whatever means he could. He had been attacked for
> no reason, and not given a proper chance to defend himself.
Valky:
> "Why do you use 'defend' as a Snape operative in that sentence?
It doesn't fit with all his other actions in the memory or anywhere
else, for that matter. Why do you think he would merely have
defended himself?
> >
> Del:
Because Snape had been *attacked*, which means that whatever he did
next would be legally considered as defense.
>
Valky:
Verbally attacked, yes. Which calls for a verbal defense.
Isn't anything else a counter-attack rather than a defense ?
So perhaps you are saying he would have chosen the "silencio"
spell. :D
Geez, I am gonna miss this!
Del:
> Being willing to humiliate someone that thoroughly is the
antithesis of nobility in my idea.
>
> Valky :
> My only argument is that it isn't really relevant to my mention of
nobility in James because I absolutely believe he abandoned all
sense of being right or good the moment he felt the humiliation of
Lily's rejection.
******Which is why I soooo *totally didn't* want to be made to argue
this in this context.*********
>
> Del :
> So it went something like : The girl I fancy has just opposed
> and refused me in public, so now I'm really pissed off, so I'll
just thoroughly humiliate my favourite adversary, just to calm
myself down ? But that's horrible, Valky !
>
Valky:
Ohhh I knew you'd find a way to contextualise it for this point! At
least I never underestimated you hey ? 8|
Horrible may be too strong a word, she didn't just reject *him*. She
rejected all HIS notions that he WAS all these things I am arguing.
He was able to glaze over her calling him a bullying toerag, but
when she says to him you're as bad as he is, well... he's stunned, I
would never call you that word, he says.... he really thinks that he
is doing the world a favour by being opposed to Snape, he was sure
Lily would get that.....
He's obviously stumped by it all, he really seems to ask the
question of himself "Why is what I am as bad as what Snape is?"
He asks Sirius for help and eventually finds himself frustrated by
his feelings.
Then he does the unthinkable and takes it all out on Snape. It's not
OK *OR* justified, just to make that point, there are some pretty
strong feelings at work in James there, thats all.
Del:
> Moreover, I believe that nobility is a character trait : it doesn't
> just disappear because one is upset. Quite the contrary in fact :
> nobility is one of those qualities that are most remarkable because
> they express themselves in conditions when you would not expect
them. Nobility is *exactly the opposite* of picking up a fight for no
> reason, or taking your own frustration on someone else.
>
Valky:
Absolutely, a fine response Del. As I never really included much to
the point defining in what way he was upset, you did really sink me
with this.
I have to speak in response, because I never really intended for it
to seem like I was saying he was *just* upset and abandoned all his
principles. It was his principles, his nobility that Lily shot down,
something he really believed was *good* about him was thrown to fire
and a reputation he had sought to build was turned to nothing in the
eyes of the person to whom he wanted it to matter the most of all.
Strong feelings at work, is all I have to say to close my argument.
> Valky wrote, about Lily saying that Snape was no better than
James : Ok this is one of those 'things you don't mean, but do mean'
things. 1. Lily was furious! You say things you don't mean when your
furious. (It's good enough for those people on the list who use it
to claim that Snape wasn't really a racist in the scene :p)
>
> Del replies : I disagree with both beliefs. Snape uttered a racist
statement, which indicates to me that he held racist beliefs. And
Lily stated that she found James no better than Snape *and* she even
explained why, which indicates to me that she despised James just as
much as Snape. <snip good physics joke :D>
>
Valky:
Well actually the particle went that way then stopped and went back
the other direction and I REALLY don't think there was all that much
change in the second direction to attract the particle. ;D
There may have been an attractant force, in the second direction,
acting on the particle all along.
Ok, enough of that Valky, I don't think James was all that wrong in
thinking that his qualities were attractive to Lily. She did
*almost* laugh at James tipping Snape when Snape attacked from
behind.
And Sirius the co-bully, especially, didn't abandon James when James
went through this *amazing transformation* we all debate he did, or
didn't, need to win Lily's heart.
No, the inner James was always the same. He learned to express
himself in a more positive way and that was fine with Sirius and
fine with Lily, and that's that.
> Valky wrote :
> > 2. Sirius and Lupin floo conversation..... "Lily never hated
James" I put a little more weight on this statement, obviously, than
you do. (btw how on earth did Sirius' words become the ones we can
question? Why is he a liar?)
>
> Del replies :
> I believe that Lily *despised* James at the time of the Pensieve
> scene, not that she hated him. And I don't think she hated Snape
> either, for that matter.
> And I don't think Sirius would outright lie. But James was his best
> friend, he's dead, Snape is not, and all those things happened
years and years ago. I would be very surprised if he didn't do a bit
of rewriting History. Not changing things altogether, but modifying
> details and motives and the general atmosphere. We all do, why not
> Sirius ?
>
Valky:
Treading a semantic fine line, Del? I thought you were a
scientist. ;P
If we debate meaning of a word, we'll be here all century.
So I'll just say, Lily spoke out at James actions with a bit of
insult for good measure, or effect what have you. Her last flay at
him was mostly confined to his appalling choices in behaviour, for
the most she could see, that was, what was wrong with him, and it
certainly would taint whatever is inside because, gosh darn it,
we've been debating just that for some very long posts
now............. deep breath .....
James had likely done some homework on Lily , he was indeed very
crushing on her already; he was bright, according to MacGonagall;
and he was completely unabashed of his behaviour until Lily pointed
out to him that it didn't impress her. If he *honestly* thought that
a girl like Lily couldn't possibly respect him for *something*,
*anything* he was doing in the pensieve scene then surely he would
have been blushing red and profoundly apologising the moment she
appeared in his view.
No, absolutely he thought that he was being Brave and Noble and that
Lily would entirely agree that "Snape existing" was full and just
cause to stand over and demonstrate him a fool.
> Valky wrote :
> > For now, I am simply not convinced that James needed to change
all
> > that drastically.
>
> Del replies :
> Lily was, and she knew James better than you do ;-P
>
Valky:
Oh yes! Better than we all do, for now............
Phew, great stuff Del! My hat's off to you for your remarkable
sportsmanship and fabulous argument. Thankyou very much for a good
clean fight.
Now I bid a fond Adieu.
I will be, intermittently, available to keep my promise that I would
defend James to the 11th of never, the confirmed Half Blood Prince
release date as I have it :P (Just kidding to JKR I know it will be
worth any wait she needs to get it finished)
Best to you All
Valky
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive