FF: Snape, Harry, Dumbledore, and flaws in the books
dzeytoun
dzeytoun at cox.net
Thu Jul 15 04:35:53 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 106364
> HunterGreen:
> Not really. I was more curious to those who think his teaching
> methods are horrible and those who think there might be some reason
> that Dumbledore is allowing it, what do you think should be done
> about it? Personally, I don't think anything *needs* to be done
about
> it, because the situation is not spinning out of control; meaning
> that the students are learning, and no one is getting scarred by
his
> insults (just my opinion only, I don't want this to spin into
another
> Snape debate). For those who *disagree*, what should be done to him?
>
Well, I agree that nothing can probably be done about Snape for
political reasons, although I agree with Alla that he should be
removed from Hogwarts the moment his services as a spy are no longer
needed. However, something probably could be done for his students.
That is Neville in particular, who even much more than Harry has
never had a chance in Potions. I would be very pleased if, should
Neville scrape by with at least an A on his OWL, he were offered the
chance to study for a Potions NEWT under another tutor. I am sure
there are other students for whom this would be a fair policy as well.
Indeed, I think much of the problem many of us have with Snape is
that he is the ONLY option for taking potions at Hogwarts and
students have to take him EVERY year (a mathematical impossibility,
by the way, as there aren't enough hours in the week for Snape to
teach that many potions sections). If students had another option
for fulfilling their potions studies, or if they only had to endure
Snape say two years out of the seven, then most of the objections
would dry up. So perhaps a very good answer to what should be done
about Severus is that Dumbledore should hire another potions teacher
in addition to Snape.
Dzeytoun
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive