Umbridge a Hag? was Re: Snape a vampire?

[nkafkafi]

No: HPFGUIDX 107482

> > Neri:
> > 
> > Hmmm, together with ESE!Lupin that's already two 
> half-humans/diguised- as-humans that are evil. Of course we 
> still have Hagrid as a good  half-human, and vampire!Snape is 
> perhaps not evil, but not exactly good either. I feel that with all
> the 
> anti-bigotry theme of HP we can  afford at most one evil 
> half-human.
> >
> Pippin:
> 
> There's Madame Maxime,  Firenze and the mer-people, too. And 
> the rest of the centaurs behave themselves most of the time, as 
> much as humans do. The *disguised* half-humans do seem to 
> be ripe for evil, but if Hagrid's reformed attitude: "Yeh don' have 
> ter be ashamed of what yeh are," is right, then we might expect 
> those who *are* ashamed to wander astray.
> 


Neri:
Yes, now it really makes sense.

But still, with wereolf!Lupin, vampire!Snape, half-giant!Hagrid and 
half-hag!Umbridge it starting to look like being just plain human is 
a disqualifier for a teacher at Hogwarts.

I guess Prof. Flitwick could be part house-elf, Sprout a part-Goblin, 
DD a part-bumblebee and Trelawney clearly has a just a tiny bit of 
centaur blood which explains her erratic prophetic performances. But 
what is McGonagall? Could she be the granddaughter of the Loch-Ness 
kelpie?

And of course, since they're all apparently ashamed of their mixed 
origin, they must be all evil. A frightening thought.

Neri