Snape's part in death of Sirius
potioncat
willsonkmom at msn.com
Wed Jul 28 19:52:03 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 107995
Neri:
> Furthermore, all this haggling about the timeline does not change
the
> fact that, when Snape first contacted HQ, he didn't bother to tell
> them that Harry had a false vision from Voldy's mind about Sirius
> held hostage in the DoM. And according to DD, Snape did realize
this
> part.
>
> Avoiding just one of the above two mistakes would have likely
> prevented the DoM battle and Sirius' death.
>
>
Potioncat:
To be honest, I didn't go upthread to review. As it is, my kids
call me a HarryPotterHead and my husband thinks I have a cyber-
boyfriend. (OK, men, which one of you is to be named in the suit?)
"If" we are arguing time, with time being important in Snape's
actions, then, yes, considering that JKR made an error "or" used her
magic universe as someone else suggested, makes sense and is
allowable.
But, lets look at canon....not a timeline. OoP, chapter 37 p830 (US)
"... He, like you attempted to contact Sirius at once. I should
explain that members of the Order of the Phoenix have more reliable
methods of communicating than the fire in Dolores Umbridge's
office. Professor Snape found that Sirius was alive and safe in
Grimmauld Place."
OK, I can read to that to mean he made contact, explained the
situation and determined that Sirius was alive and safe. You
(impersonal you, of course) You can read it to mean that Snape
simply asked "Are you alive and safe?" I'd love to elaborate here
on how "I" think that would go, but it would appear sarcastic, and I
am honestly not being sarcastic. But, see, we can both sincerely
read this differently. (Just like the good old Sorting Hat.)
To continue quotes:
"When, however, you did not return from your trip into the forest
with Dolores Umbridge, Professor Snape grew worried that you still
believed Sirius to be a captive of Lord Voldermort's. He alerted
certain Order members at once."
We don't know when this is. He contacts Grimmauld Place the first
time moments after leaving Umbridge's office.("at once") We do not
know when he found out Potter, Umbridge and Granger had gone into
the forest and not returned. Did he find out, wait a little then
get worried? Or did he find out at one time that Harry had gone into
the forest and had not returned? Canon does not tell us. But again
we're told he contacted HQ "at once".
To Continue quotes:
" ...A Moody, N Tonks, K Shackelbolt and R Lupin were at
headquarters when he made contact. All agreed to go to your aid at
once. Professor Snape requested that Sirius remain behind, as he
needed somebody to remain at headquarters to tell me what had
happened, for I was due there at any moment. In the meantime he,
Professor Snape, intended to search the forest for you."
We don't know if Snape said, "Perhaps Potter is at the DoM, will you
go look?" or if during Snape's report, one of the aurors
said, "Let's go look in the DoM!"
Somehow, Snape knows that DD is due "any moment" at Grimmauld
Place. Did he talk to DD somewhere between calls to HQ? Is it a
scheduled event? Did KS tell him during this conversation? Canon
doesn't say. He requests that Black stay behind for those few
moments to brief DD. And, while Black was to wait for DD, Snape was
going to search the forest.
I think "intended" here means "planned" and that he did indeed
search. Black was to stay at HQ and Snape was to search the
forest. I think, that Snape's intention was that if someone would
wait at HQ to report to DD, Snape was free to go look for Potter. I
know some take it to mean: he intended to, but didn't. Again, canon
interpretation. Are both interpretations valid?
Now, if all this is to make or refute the claim that Snape is the
one responsible for Black's death. I don't buy it. I think that
not having an Order Member at HQ waiting for DD, caused a delay in
DD's arrival at the DoM and also contributed to loss of life.
But I don't see the use in naming one person as being at fault.
Mistakes were made by several people across a span of time. It's a
war. People die.
BTW, I just completely re-read this and realised I snipped
the "other" mistake Neri mentions. I show that canon does not say
whether Snape reported the false vision, or not, although I read it
as he did.
I no longer recall what the second error was. (Mind like a sieve!)
Maybe we should ask JKR what she intended?
Potioncat who hopes everyone knows this is all in fun
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive