Fudge and Harry as Gryffindor's heir

[arrowsmithbt]

No: HPFGUIDX 108087

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "boyd_smythe" <boyd.t.smythe at f...> wrote:
> > Kneasy wrote <snip>:
> > What Tom sees is part of himself, transferred along with the 
> powers. And Voldy!Tom is probably pure Slytherin fodder, even without 
> the possibility that there's some of the original Salazar in Voldy 
> too. <
> 
> boyd:
> 
> Then we're in agreement, Kneasy? Had not Lily's sacrifice embedded 
> parts of LV in baby Harry, he might be a mere squib? Let's see, he's a 
> strong wizard for his age, just like LV was, he uses the *same* wand 
> as LV, he's a parselmouth, and they even look a bit alike. Could it be 
> that Squib!Harry got *all* his powers from Voldie?
> 

Kneasy:
If you take it to extremes then yes, that's one possibility.
Of course he may not be quite that bad - he might only be as rotten
at magic as Neville and just the larger proportion of his magical powers
derive from Voldy instead of all  of them.
But it's reasonable to surmise that the Voldy bits in Harry automatically
chose/were suited to a wand as close to Voldy's original as it was possible
to get. Which puts the graveyard scene into a different light - is it 
possible to AK *yourself*? Would the destruction of Voldy bits in
one result in the death of Voldemort in the other?
Novel form of suicide if you can do it.
And a new potential final resolution - Harry's dying destroys Voldy.
Cor! That'd upset some.

Boyd:
> Boy, if pure-blooded, arrogant James had known baby Harry to be a 
> squib, he might have been upset enough to...to...hand Harry over to 
> LV to save himself and Lily? See post #107977 (SHH) JAM TAKES BIBS for 
> a very subversive theory that could be sadly true.
> 

Kneasy:
You've been reading Fraser's "The Golden Bough" again.
You  really shouldn't; it only gets you excited.