Chamber of Secrets - The Unexplained
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at aol.com
Sat Jul 31 20:31:46 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 108306
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Magda Grantwich
<mgrantwich at y...> wrote:
Bonny:
> > 4) The use of the word "ancestor" as opposed to "descendant" in
> > regards to Riddle and Slytherin, in Harry's conversation with
> > Dumbledore.
> >
> > - On page 245 of the Canadian soft-cover edition, Dumbledore
tells
> > Harry that Voldemort is the last remaining ancestor of Salazar
> > Slytherin. The last remaining ANCESTOR. Not DESCENDANT. Is this a
> > flint? Or could there be some strange reversal of time at work?
> > Because, of course, an ancestor is someone you are descended
from -
> > so Tom should be Slytherin's DESCENDANT, not his ancestor. Hmmm.
Magda:
> Actually, in the 19th century (where the wizarding world seems to be
> stuck half the time and when Dumbledore was born), the word
> "ancestor" could be used in place of "descendent". It's used that
> way in some novels. So no, it's not a flint.
>
Geoff:
I'm quite sure that I have seen it mentioned on the group more than
once that it /has/ been acknowledged as a flint.
Certainly, my UK edition (also p.245) has "descendant".
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive