What's wrong with being bad ?
k_2324
k_2324 at yahoo.com.au
Sun Jun 20 23:56:58 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 102214
Lol, I totally agree. The first thought that came to my mind when
reading the books is the Slytherins are getting it pretty rough. The
OWLs are externally marked exams, are they not. The Slytherin
students are going to find it difficult doing well in these exams
after years of being babied and spoilt by Severus. It constantly
happens in real life. For example the transitioning between high
school and University. Some private and Catholic schools spoil and
hand feed their students information. Sure, they get stellar marks
on their final exams, but once they reach University where the
lecturers don't care, they are lost. Once they reach University and
are now treated like an adult, you are expected to do your own
research, it's your responsibility to do work at home, it's your
responsibility to ensure you understand everything after each
lecture. Half of these people drop out in the first year.
Severus's teaching methods will inspire the Gryffindors to make sure
they KNOW their work before they come to class. Harry's very first
lesson with Severus should have made that clear to him. Not being
able to answer Severus's questions should have reinforced the idea
that before class, you should read the material. Sure Severus takes
points off him and seems a bit harsher on him than other people, but
so what. It is unreasonable to go through life expecting everyone to
like you.
While Severus's teaching methods are not the most effective, neither
is it terribly ineffective. It is the Slytherins that are getting
the rough end of the stick where his teaching methods are concerned.
A lot of Gryffindors should do well, purely because Severus has been
constantly on their back for the past 5 years.
"k_2324"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive