Snape NOT a Vampire (Was The Marauders are all Gryffindors)

[melclaros]

No: HPFGUIDX 92152

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Diana_Sirius_fan" 
<siriuslove71 at y...> wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Tanya Swaine <swaine.t at x> 
wrote:
> > At 15:16 5/03/2004, you wrote:
> > 
> > >Diana Wrote:
I will only take my hat off after book 7 
> is
> > >over and it concludes with Snape not being a vamp.  Up until 
then I
> > >still think it is possible.  > > 
> > 
> > Tanya now:
> > 
> > I'm on the fence with this one, undecided either way.  But I 
would 
> of liked 
> > for the answer to be
> > a strong yes or no.  However, she could be unsure as to what a 
the > link  > asked of in the question
> > could mean.  I'm not even sure myself.

then Diana
> 
>.  She answers it as "I don't think so" which is neither a yes or 
> a no, so we can still think that maybe there is a connection.  I 
just 
> do not see how others saw her answer as a "there is no way Snape 
is a 
> Vampire" because that is not what was said.    


Mel:
What was not said is exactly what you mentioned: "Wait and see" , "I 
can't tell you that", "I can't give that much away", "Keep reading 
and you'll find out more". She's pitifully transparent when she's 
trying to "hide" information.
So I guess unless she titles book 6 "Harry Potter Determines 
(Professor)Snape is Not a Vampire" some folks just won't give this a 
rest.

Rock on if it keeps you happy. 

Honestly, I wouldn't give 2 knuts for anything JKR said in any 
interview or chat but if someone forced me to choose what 
she "meant" here I'd have to go with the "sorry, no he's not" camp.
But then I've known that all along.

melpomene