Snape NOT a Vampire (Was The Marauders are all Gryffindors)
Diana_Sirius_fan
siriuslove71 at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 5 15:27:23 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 92200
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "melclaros" <melclaros at y...>
wrote:
> Mel:
> What was not said is exactly what you mentioned: "Wait and
see" , "I
> can't tell you that", "I can't give that much away", "Keep reading
> and you'll find out more". She's pitifully transparent when she's
> trying to "hide" information.
> So I guess unless she titles book 6 "Harry Potter Determines
> (Professor)Snape is Not a Vampire" some folks just won't give this
a
> rest.
>
> Rock on if it keeps you happy.
>
> Honestly, I wouldn't give 2 knuts for anything JKR said in any
> interview or chat but if someone forced me to choose what
> she "meant" here I'd have to go with the "sorry, no he's not" camp.
> But then I've known that all along.
>
> melpomene
This is not a hot topic for me as I could care less if Snape was a
Vampire or not. But...if JK did answer the question in any of the
above mentioned ways some would automatically come to the conclusion
that there is a connection. JK could have said, "no, there is not a
connection" and the subject would have been dropped. She did not.
She left it open to discussion, which I think is brilliant on her
part. Diana
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive