Why has DD never suggested Snape thank Harry? (Was: Why has DD never suggest

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 117798


--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "eggplant9998" :

> Even if you're correct I don't think that mitigates
> Snape's crime in the slightest; to start punishing
> a person before you have any clear idea about what
> really happened or even give the accused two 
> minutes to explain his side of things is not 
> justice. But I don't think you're correct,
> I don't think Snape cared one bit if Harry
> really broke a school rule or not, he just 
> found an excuse to make Harry suffer some more
> so he exploited it as far as he could.


Alla:

I am ALL for bashing what Snape does to Harry (I find it inexcusable 
95% of the time), but could we at least have HIS guilt proven, 
before we do that? :)
If Snape did not witness the beginning of the conversation, he was 
not committing any crime, IMO, he was doing his job as a teacher ( 
Not that I think that he is doing a very good one :o).

I agree with you that Snape often finds an excuse to make Harry 
suffer, I am just not sure if this is the case. It very well could 
be, I just don't think we have sufficient evidence yet.