Unfortunate!Peter
Sharon
azriona at juno.com
Sun Nov 21 12:36:58 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 118278
> > azirona:
> There are as many motivations as there are stars in the sky.
> Blackmail, torture, ransom, cash reward, fear, love, resentment,
> reason (I mean, maybe Peter really did think Voldy was right), or
> even the idea that Peter has been working for DD since the first
day
> at school.
> >
>
> Kneasy:
> Yes, there are. How many would apply to Peter, particularly if he
got
> into DD's clutches while still at school? Only two that I can
think of
> - idealism and fear. And I don't trust idealists.
>
Actually, depending on how you look at the situation, I think all of
those motivations could apply to Peter. It depends on how you spin
it:
A quote from PoA, Chapter 19 'The Servant of Lord Voldemort':
"You sold Lily and James to Voldemort," said Black, who was shaking
too. "Do you deny it?"
"Sirius, Sirius, what could I have done? The Dark Lord...you have no
idea...he has weapons you can't imagine...I was scared, Sirius, I was
never brave like you and Remus and James. I never meant it to
happen...He-Who-Must-Be-Named forced me..."
<snip>
"He - he was taking over everywhere!" gasped Pettigrew. "Wh-what was
there to be gained by refusing him?"
<snip>
"You don't understand!" whined Pettigrew. "He would have killed me,
Sirius!"
Okay, let's begin:
Blackmail:
"He has weapons..." It's one of Peter's first lines of defense,
really. Be quiet, Sirius, he's got weapons, he's got power you don't
understand. Implied is that Peter has even seen these weapons at
work and therefore knows first hand. Why? Would he have seen Voldy
use them on others? From OoP, Chp 5 "The Order of the Phoenix" -
"Voldemort doesn't march up to people's houses and bang on their
front doors, Harry," said Sirius. "He tricks, jinxes, and blackmails
them." It is entirely possible that Voldemort blackmailed Peter into
working for him. Why - again, can't tell you. But it's pretty easy
to come up with reasons. (Holding family members hostage. Holding
information hostage. Threatening with a much worse fate for James &
Lily if Peter doesn't cooperate.)
Torture:
Peter out and out tells Sirius that his life was on the line.
Voldemort would have killed him for non-compliance. Now, we're
talking about a bad guy here from the classic line-up of bad guys,
who before they deliver the killing blow to their adversaries,
decides to torture them a bit first. (I mean, really. How many
people actually read the graveyard scene without thinking of every
bad James Bond movie in existance?) Voldy couldn't have grabbed
Peter and said, "Hey, bud, go find out where James & Lily are hiding
and tell me, or I'll kill you." Heck no. There had to be some
*motivation* in there. Voldy probably did quite a Cruciatus number
on Peter first.
Ransom:
Interesting, isn't it, that Sirius actually uses the word "sold" when
making his official accusation of Peter in the Shrieking Shack.
*Sold*...not 'betrayed', not 'turned them in', not 'handed over'.
*Sold*. As if there was an actual exchange of...something, for that
information that Peter had as Secret Keeper.
(This could probably play into an ESE!Sirius theory, but I'd rather
steer clear of that for the moment.)
What possibly could be so important and wonderful to Peter that he
would be willing to betray his friends and cause the death of their
son just to get his hands on it? Power? Money? Fame? The first
and last are cetainly things that Peter didn't have before - he
willingly admits that he's not as powerful as the rest of his
friends, and before the events at GH he certainly wasn't the most
well-known - at least, not for the right things. How ironic it would
be had Peter turned in Lily and James because he wanted fame, because
it's actually what he ended up getting - except he could hardly enjoy
it, seeing as the fame was supposed to be posthomous!
Cash Reward:
Which sort of goes in with ransom. Actually, I do think this one is
the least likely of the possibilities, and I can find more reasons to
argue against it than for it. But think for a moment...here's Peter,
who has been watching James create a life for himself, barely twenty,
wife and child and home in the country, and there's Remus, the
opposite end of the spectrum, poor and alone and probably pretty
unemployable due to his lycanthropy...Peter, as the impartial
observer, may have seen the unfairness of it all and thought to play
a bit of Robin Hood. Take from Voldy and give to Remus (or keep for
himself), and here's this lovely piece of information that will not
only bring James down a notch or two.
Because of course James is too strong to be killed. He'd defied the
Dark Lord three times already, right? "I never meant for this to
happen," says Peter. He didn't think James would have to gall to go
and *die*. And what's one baby more or less...right?
Fear:
Oh, the easiest of them all, of course. Because the one emotion that
is a constant, every time we see Peter (and even some of the time
that we see him as Scabbers) is fear. Fear of death, fear of life,
fear of Sirius, fear of Voldy, fear of Nagini, fear of dark shadows,
fear of light shadows. Peter is probably scared of chocolate
biscuits, too. "I was never brave like you and Remus and James,"
says Peter. Fear is a powerful thing. Peter obviously never learned
about FDR.
Love:
Well, it is what the whole series seems to be centered on, if you
listen to Dumbledore, anyway. And there is that whole Stockholm
Syndrome thing (which I will be up front and say I don't quite buy
myself, so I'll make a very poor argument for it). But there is
every possibility that Peter does feel some sort of...(ugh, I hate to
even type it) obligation, if you will, to Voldemort. And Voldy
himself continually tells Peter "You're scared of me, you regret
coming back to me, you wish I was gone." If all of that is true -
why did Peter go back in the first place? What made Peter return?
Fear wouldn't have pulled him back - in fact, it should have pushed
him away.
And while you may argue that being an accomplished Leglimens, Voldy
would of course *know* what Peter was thinking...well, being an
accomplished Leglimens, wouldn't Voldy also attempt to *alter* what
Peter is thinking as well? Perhaps Voldy telling Peter how hated he
is isn't so much reinforcing what Peter already beleives as it is
trying to convince Peter of the opposite.
Resentment:
Oh, loads of resentment in Peter. "I was never brave *like you*"...
It can't feel good to know that you're constantly compared to your
friends, constantly seen as the tag-a-long. "That fat little boy,"
Rosmerta calls him (PoA, Chp 10). "Never quite in their league...I
was quite sharp with him," says McGonagall (ibid).
No one is so stupid as not to know when you're being treated
differently than those close to you. Peter knew that James and
Sirius were made much of by teachers and contemporaries alike. And
when even your Head of House sees you as the numbskull, while your
friends are patronized as saints (and are hardly even close to it),
it can't make you feel good.
Did Peter have reason to resent James and Sirius. You betcha. Did
it turn him to the Death Eaters for confirmation of his abilities?
Maybe.
Reason (or Idealism, as you put it):
What's Voldemort's plan here, really? Is it that he wants to wipe
out the Muggle from the face of the planet entirely, or just make
sure that the pureblooded wizards are still taken seriously?
I mean, maybe Voldy isn't so much Adolf Hitler as he is just a rather
militant branch of the Daughters of the American Revolution.
Seriously - you think the DAR is all good and cheerful and stuff, but
they so much stock in bloodlines and family trees it makes the Black
Family Tapestry look like a second grade homework assignment.
Is it that Voldemort is really against Muggles and Mudbloods - or is
he just worried that an important distinction within the wizarding
world is being lost? Remember, he himself is a Halfblood. By
definition, he's a Mudblood! And he is not unintelligent (had he
been so, he would never have gotten as far, nor would he have been a
prefect at Hogwarts). He himself must know that after several
generations, remaining purely with pureblooded families will cause
serious inbreeding, and that also after a few generations, the new
blood that marrying Halfbloods and Muggles will create stronger,
better, more powerful wizards. As well, *those* wizards could
consider themselves pureblooded wizards, as their parents and
grandparents and great-grandparents were wizards as well.
Is Voldemort really saying that he wants all Halfbloods and Muggles
gone - or is he just trying to preserve a world in which wizards and
Muggles live seperate lives - which isn't all that bad of an idea,
after all. The more Muggles who know about wizards, the worse off
the wizards will be. Even a few of the "good" wizards have admitted
as such to Harry.
And perhaps it was this theory that Peter believed in. The meathod
of course, was probably a bit too violent for his liking, but the
ideals remained the same. Sirius' parents, after all, believed in
Voldy's cause but did not participate. Perhaps at one point, Peter
was the same - and then was roped in before he had a chance to
say 'no'.
Working for DD from Day One:
All wizards, according to Sirius, are related to each other, if you
go back far enough. And we don't know very much about Peter's or
Dumbledore's ancestry, do we? (Except that DD is not related to
Harry. Thank ye gods, had it turned out that DD was Lily's long lost
grandfather I would have jumped off a bridge or something.) There is
every possibility that Peter and DD go waaaaay back. Maybe being
related is a bit of a stretch - but that they would have had some
sort of knowledge of each other isn't unlikely.
And this whole theory goes so much hand-in-hand with the DoubleAgent!
Peter theory, I can't go into much without going into *that*, and
this entry is already horrendously long, so I will stop there, and
maybe expound on that another day.
--az
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive