Harry learning from Snape (was: stopper death)
totorivers
tombadgerlock at freesurf.fr
Fri Oct 1 21:02:12 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 114407
SSSusan:
> Harry has understandably been frustrated and angered by Snape's
> treatment of him, but I have my doubts that Snape will see any
> reason to or show any interest in changing *his* behavior towards
> Harry, so if things are going to change, I think Harry will simply
> have to decide, "Hey, we're supposedly on the same side. It's
> going to kill me, but I'm going to SHUT OUT all the crap he throws
> at me, and just work. I'm going to SHOW HIM that I'm not a stupid,
> arrogant, strutting git."
>
> <snip> Harry has learned *some* from Snape, but (again, understandably,
> imo) he's not learned all he could because of the "stuff" that's gotten
> in the way. I want to see Harry work around the "stuff" and prove he
> is becoming a mature man who knows that he MUST master his emotions
> and take responsibility for learning what he needs to learn.
Toto:
But that kind of maturing doesn't exist. You could put even some
kind of peace model prize and put them with a teacher who hates
their guts and you'll get nothing, or only a minimum. It's mentally
impossible, a student has to respect a teacher, and Snape is a
feared teacher, not a respected one.
Furthermore, there is the problem of occlumency: it's a class
about the mind, and in those class, either there is a great link of
mentor.favoritepupil, or nothing can be done. Harry *feel*s Snape's
hate, and so on during those lessons. As Dumbledore said in the last
chapter of OotP, it was a serious miscalculation on his part to put
Snape with Harry. I understand he would want to give Snape a last
chance before throwing him out of the order (figuratively
speaking, as there are chances that the order become Harry's, if
Snape doesn't change his attitude he will be come a liability, if he
isn't one already), but he was waay too idealistic in this case.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive