Harry learning from Snape (was: stopper death)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Oct 2 14:18:25 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 114428
> Toto:
> But that kind of maturing doesn't exist. You could put even
some kind of peace model prize and put them with a teacher
who hates their guts and you'll get nothing, or only a minimum.
It's mentally impossible, a student has to respect a teacher, and
Snape is a feared teacher, not a respected one.<
We don't know that Snape hates Harry's guts. I doubt it. We only
have Quirrell's word that he hates Harry, and Quirrell, sharing his
soul with Voldemort, is hardly a reliable judge. Harry keeps
being mistaken about who hates who: he thinks that Lily hated
James and that Sirius hated Kreacher. He doesn't really
understand that you can treat someone badly and not hate them.
To respond to some other comments on this thread:
I don't think Harry has to *show* Snape anything; it's part of the
problem that Harry thinks he does. The person Harry has to
*show* is himself. Once he's realized that he's never going to be
able to control the way he looks to other people, he can stop
being so sensitive about his reputation, and Snape's jibes will
lose their power.
As for Snape's duty to be mature, our society takes a different
view of the teacher's role than Hogwarts does. If modelling
mature adult behavior ever becomes part of the job description
for Hogwarts teachers, then Snape won't be the only one who
has to go. And I think Harry would rather put up with a dozen
Snapes than lose Hagrid.
That is one reason that Dumbledore is not going to sit Snape
down -- the other reason is that as Dumbledore said in PoA, he
has no power to make other men see the truth. Which is to say,
that's one of the powers Dumbledore is too noble to use. If
people share Dumbledore's views, it should be because they
want to, not because Albus Dumbledore is good at being
obeyed. Dumbledore has no more right to remake others in his
image than Voldemort does.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive