Stubby Bored Man?/Hermione can be wrong!
finwitch
finwitch at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 7 14:27:03 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 115078
> mhbobbin wrote:
> > > Boardman. Bored Man. I don't mean the whole story as reported in
> The Quibbler is legitimate. But what would have prevented Sirius
from
> sneaking out of Grim Old Place to sing with The Hobgoblins. He was,
> after all, a Bored Man. And this particularly far-fetched article
is
> mentioned twice. First, when Kingsley gives the paper to Arthur
> thinking Sirius would find it interesting. Second, when Harry picks
up
> Luna's magazine.
> Carol responds:
> As for singing with the Hobgoblins as Stubby Boardman, the only
> evidence for the truth of that story is the bad pun. I personally
> don't think Sirius was getting any recreation beyond screaming at
> Kreacher and drinking himself into oblivion. Unless, possibly, he
was
> reading Snape's reports! ;-)
Finwitch:
Perhaps. Still, they *did* state Sirius as innocent, yes? At least
that much was right. Also, Quibbler was the paper that printed the
*truth* Fudge didn't want the public to know...
Harry didn't believe the article, but how would he know? And for the
man not looking like Sirius, well, Sirius disguised himself. I'd love
for it to be true...
Anyway, if I were Harry, I'd subscribe to Quibbler.
And Hermione WAS wrong about Thestrals! Maybe Luna and Quibbler are
right about other things, too... And um - Luna is a Ravenclaw, so she
has love for wit, intellect and learning. As to why she was reading
the paper upside down - maybe it was just to get a different
perspective or simply because ability to read upside down can be
useful?
And what comes to Nargles and all those other beings Hermione claims
don't exist - well, Hermione probably thought magic didn't exist
until she got her Hogwarts letter and someone showed her magic is
real! She didn't believe when Trelawney gave her *true* prophecy
Harry witnessed. She didn't believe thestrals exist. She doesn't
believe that house-elves can be truly devoted, love working and take
offer of freedom as an insult - in short, there *are* cases where
Hermione has been wrong before. Why not this?
And further.. The DADA-group. First she thinks it's a good idea, and
it is HER idea to begin with. (Yes, I think it was). Then, she
suddenly changes her mind just because Sirius supports it. (Never
mind whether Sirius was living trough Harry or not.)
Considering that, the fact that Harry did stop long enough to listen
and try to contact Sirius when his vision tells him Voldemort is
torturing Sirius - it IS really much. Harry's further disregard to
Hermione - well, if she's SO against Sirius that she'd drop the idea
of DA just because Sirius was for it... Why *would* Harry go with
her, when it's SIRIUS who is (supposedly) in trouble?
Also, Hermione could have said that just because Sirius pointed out
her error in choosing Hog's Head instead of three Broomsticks...
Oh, I wish I could read HBP..
Finwitch
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive