Harry's protection

greatelderone greatelderone at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 14 06:08:55 UTC 2004


No: HPFGUIDX 112894

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "snow15145" <snow15145 at y...> 
wrote:
> Snow:
> I don't want this to sound bad but wouldn't a counter (curse) be 
> during a curse not after one? To counter ones intention would be 
> before or during
 not after, wouldn't it? Curse and Charm seem to 
be 
> the bigger issue. I suspect that there is no counter of any type 
to 
> an AK what so ever, whether it is a countercurse or a 
countercharm. 

GEO: What was used at GH was hardly a countercharm. It was a wide 
blanketing protection against Voldemort and his powers created by 
the act of Voldemort killing Lily. Countercharms and curses are more 
like spells that are spoken or used by the wand. What happened there 
was more of an unconscious magical act by Lily and definitely not a 
countercharm or curse.

> If this were true then whatever killing curse was used (on Harry) 
at 
> GH could not have been an AK, which cannot be countered. 

GEO: And the spell wasn't countered. Remember it left a scar on 
Harry and rebounded and destroyed Voldemort's body and quite a bit 
of the house. 





More information about the HPforGrownups archive