Harry's protection
greatelderone
greatelderone at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 14 06:08:55 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 112894
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "snow15145" <snow15145 at y...>
wrote:
> Snow:
> I don't want this to sound bad but wouldn't a counter (curse) be
> during a curse not after one? To counter ones intention would be
> before or during
not after, wouldn't it? Curse and Charm seem to
be
> the bigger issue. I suspect that there is no counter of any type
to
> an AK what so ever, whether it is a countercurse or a
countercharm.
GEO: What was used at GH was hardly a countercharm. It was a wide
blanketing protection against Voldemort and his powers created by
the act of Voldemort killing Lily. Countercharms and curses are more
like spells that are spoken or used by the wand. What happened there
was more of an unconscious magical act by Lily and definitely not a
countercharm or curse.
> If this were true then whatever killing curse was used (on Harry)
at
> GH could not have been an AK, which cannot be countered.
GEO: And the spell wasn't countered. Remember it left a scar on
Harry and rebounded and destroyed Voldemort's body and quite a bit
of the house.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive