JKR's site up-date - Rumours Section
Jim Ferer
jferer at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 6 22:18:37 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 127214
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Gregory Lynn <Gregory.Lynn at g...>
wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2005 11:26 AM, templar1112002 <templar1112002 at y...> wrote:
>
> > So, I believe that one of the famous theories is debunked... Ron is
> > Ron, not Dumbledore.
> >
>
> > Marcela
> >
> Gregory Lynn:
> Actually all it means is that Dumbledore isn't Ron come back from
the future.
>
> He could still be a Ron that is artificially aged or who went back to
> the past and grew old from there. Or even a Ron from the past
> resulting from a cloning of the current Ron after he goes to the past
> in the future.
Wow. There's nothing like refloating the Titanic. What we're doing is
struggling with JKR for the ownership of the characters and the story.
A lot of these theories would make great fics, where we could borrow
the characters for a while and make them do or be whatever we wanted.
"I've also heard a whisper about Ron and Hermione's son
time-travelling, so I shall go further and tell you that NONE of the
characters in the books has returned from the future." -- JKR.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive