[HPforGrownups] JKR's site up-date - Rumours Section

[Troels Forchhammer]

No: HPFGUIDX 127217

At 14:29 06-04-05 -0400, Gregory Lynn wrote:

>On Apr 6, 2005 11:26 AM, templar1112002 <templar1112002 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > So, I believe that one of the famous theories is debunked... Ron is
> > Ron, not Dumbledore.

Which was hardly surprising, but nice enough of her to debunk it,
so that it can rest in peace.


>Actually all it means is that Dumbledore isn't Ron come back from the future.
>
>He could still be a Ron that is artificially aged or who went back to
>the past and grew old from there.  Or even a Ron from the past
>resulting from a cloning of the current Ron after he goes to the past
>in the future.

Not even by a stringent logical analysis of the text can it be brought
to allow any such scenario.

"NONE of the characters in the books has returned from the future."

That means that none of the characters is an older version of another
character. Thank god.

Troels Forchhammer