#3 in Snape's Trial (was: Accio 2005 press release...)
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 27 22:57:55 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 128160
>>Alla:
>Guilty, Betsy, you know he is. :-) On Items 1, 2 and 4 for sure and
3 - well, lets' wait and see.<
Betsy:
Snape's work as a spy for the Order has already cleared Snape of
items 1 and 2, as seen in GoF.
>>Alla:
<snip>
>How do you know that Snape is not Neville's biggest fear anymore?<
Betsy:
I don't *know*, I just hope that Neville has moved beyond his
wussiness of yesteryear and developed into someone with a bit more
of a spine. He stood up to Bellatrix, Snape should be easy for him
now.
>>Alla:
>By the way, who said that Neville is going to be my only witness?
>Does throwing Harry out of his office rings any bells to you for
example?<
Betsy:
As an example of Snape taking an action designed to *prevent*
visiting serious bodily harm upon a student, yes throwing Harry out
of his office does ring a few bells. And considering everything
else Harry has put up with from teachers, Snape is the *least* of
his worries.
>>Alla:
>Do I have to count how many times Snape stands over Neville or
Harry in the classroom in the threatening manner? OK, probably those
are not enough for criminal prosecution in RL, but will do quite
well in this one, IMO.<
Betsy:
But doesn't that just go towards Carol's argument that this is a
kangaroo court? It's the equivilent of throwing someone behind bars
because they looked at you funny - tyrannical in the extreme.
>>Alla:
>Here is the definition of assault fron on line dictionary.
<snip>
>I especially love the part "or even holding up the fist at him in a
threatening or insulting manner".<
Betsy:
I... It's... You do see the madness therein, don't you? I mean,
all of Gryffindor would be in jail, and I'm talking Dean and Seamus
and Neville here. In an argument over quidditch teams.
Betsy, who's reached her posting limit of 3. (There is still a
limit, right?)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive