[HPforGrownups] Importance of Death in Horcrux Making

[Juli]

No: HPFGUIDX 136668


ongj87 <ongj87 at yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm a little confused on one part.  Who says that the murder has to be significant to make a horcrux? Don't we know that Frank Bryce was the death that led to Voldemort making Nagini as horcrux?  And I'm certain that Frank Bryce wasn't at all significant to Voldemort, he was just another muggle to him.  Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.

Juli
 
Nobody says that the murder HAS To be significant to creat an Horcrux, it's just the way Voldemort likes to do it. I think he created the Ring-Horcrux with his father's murder, the Locket-Horcrux with that old lady's murder, the diary maybe with Myrtle (I'm not so sure since Tom didn't kill Myrtle, the basilisk did), and he wanted to use Harry to create his last Horcrux, he couldn do it, then turned into Vapor, spent years and years in the forest in Albania, until Peter Pettigrew found him, gave him a wand, and he was once again able to do magic. He went to his dad's old house, and killed (eg AK) Frank Bryce, it wasn't a significant death, but he was there, Nagini was there, so he did it. It was the first true murder after Lily, he had killed Bertha Jones (?) but it was just because she could go back and tell the MoM he was back. When he killed her, he was still very weak and I don't think he could have been able to create the Horcrux.
 
JMO,


Juli
Aol: jlnbtr
Yahoo: jlnbtr



		
---------------------------------
 Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]