Re: Harry’s new Patronus

[doddiemoemoe]

No: HPFGUIDX 137495

appellj wrote:
> 
> I'm wondering if it's significant that we don't actually *see* 
> Fawkes at the end but just hear him? Or rather, we think it's him 
> that we're hearing? What if the reason he didn't show up when DD 
was failing at the top of the tower, didn't come and swallow the 
alleged AK curse, didn't come immediately to mourn over DD's body 
the moment he "died", was because Fawkes wasn't actually there? 

**snippity snip-snip***

I believe you are asking the wrong question... You must ask 
yourslelf why Fawkes is not there... (apparently he's been absent 
for quite some times in light of DD's blackened hand...no healing 
tears...no fawkes swallowing said curse..)

Why did not Harry nor DD summon fawkes to them???

Was Fawkes already protecting someone/something? If so, who?

I absolutely do not buy "so Harry could see DD die"...that makes no 
sense...

If dd froze/imobilized Harry..then he could have done so with Draco 
as well.

No new patronus for Harry yet...

dd

(who thinks that if there is anyone who can do it....Harry will be 
able to change his patronus at will--fitting do you not think?)