It's over, Snape is evil (was: Dumbledore and Snape again)

[eggplant107]

No: HPFGUIDX 137986

"demetra1225" <tzakis1225 at n...> wrote:

> Harry certainly believes that he is
> an eyewitness to Snape killing
> Dumbledore. But is that *proof*? 

If it is not proof then exactly what would be a proof of guilt? We see
Snape make an Unbreakable Vow to kill Dumbledore and then 600 pages
later we actually see him murder the man plain as day. What more do
want, what more could an author do to convince you? The evidence  that
Voldemort killed Lilly and James is very strong but much much less
strong than the evidence that Snape killed Voldemort, and if that's
not good enough then we should release all the prisoners in jail for
lack of evidence, every single one. 

All I can say is that if I'm even charged with murder I hope you're on
my jury. 

Eggplant