YES ( was: Did Snape "murder" Dumbledore?)

[colebiancardi]

No: HPFGUIDX 138227

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "eggplant107" <eggplant107 at h...>
wrote:
> "colebiancardi" <muellem at b...> wrote:
> 
> > Full nasty mode to you, perhaps. 
> > We've seen Snape be a heck of lot
> > more nasty. Was he calling Harry names? 
> 
> No, Snape did not call Harry a doodoo head or some other nasty name so
> he gets one brownie point for that, but he did murder Dumbledore and I
> thing he should be fined one or two brownie points for that. Don't you?
> 

My verdict on Snape *murdering* DD is still out until book 7 comes
out.  There is too much up in the air.

> > why didn't Snape take Harry with them? 
> 
> Why would Snape want to do that? And take Harry where?

to LV's lair, of course.  If Snape believes that Harry will take out
LV, why not bring him there?
> 
> > why didn't Snape let the other DE kill him? 
> 
> Because Snape made an Unbreakable Vow to protect the life of Harry
> Potter until he kills Voldemort.

really?  Canon, please.

> 
> > Flitwick is a child? Tonks is a child?
> > Lupin is a child? Hey, there were some
> > adults there - why didn't Snape kill them? 
> 
> Snape is evil and Snape is a villain but Snape is not a homicidal
> maniac, he does not kill people when it not necessary. It is necessary
> to kill Dumbledore (and Voldemort) if he is to be the most powerful
> wizard in the world.

So, you want to make Snape both ESE & TW.  hmmmm.....

> 
> > [outnumbered] 100 to 1? Really? 
> 
> Yes, really.
> 
> > I only counted 6 OotP members at the base of the tower
> 
> And about 600 wizards in other parts of the castle they wanted to get
> out of after the murder.

again, at Hogwarts?  The students?  The underage wizards who kinda
*hid* until the coast was clear?    Nope, not buying that.  Snape &
the DE's could have killed all the OotP member's that were there and
caused havoc as they left.


colebiancardi