It's over, Snape is evil (was: Dumbledore and Snape again)

[colebiancardi]

No: HPFGUIDX 138438

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "eggplant107" 
<eggplant107 at h...> wrote:
> 
> The polite thing would be for me to say I can see the other side of
> the argument too, but in all honesty I can not because none of the
> reasons I've heard why a good Snape would murder Dumbledore make one
> bit of sense. Zero nada zilch.
> 
> Eggplant

Other than it wasn't *murder*?  That DD asked Snape to do so? 

To not look at Snape actions, but look to Dumbledore's actions - 
based on what you know about DD, why do you think this theory does 
not make sense?  We already know, that without a doubt, you don't 
trust Snape and you think he is *evil*.  So, without bringing Snape 
into the argument, what is so unbelievable about DD asking to die for 
the greater good of the Order? 

DD can be ruthless, you know.  He left Sirius in Azkaban for 13 
years - when he could have easily found out that it wasn't Sirius who 
killed Harry's parents.  He also had no problem convincing Flamel to 
*die* as well.  And throughout the last couple of books, DD has 
stated there are worst things than death.  

colebiancardi