Did Snape lie in Spinner's End? Was:Re: Snape and GOF
ellecain
ellecain at yahoo.com.au
Fri Dec 9 07:58:25 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 144399
>
> Jen
>
> What I'd still like to know is how Snape passed off that comment
> about helping dispose of Sirius when Nacissa was sitting right
there-
> -didn't Dumbledore say Kreacher passed the information about
Sirius
> to Narcissa? Maybe this was figured out right after the release
and
> I missed it, but it seems incongruous.
>
>
>
Elyse here, posting after some time...
I'm really glad this was brought up. I cannot believe I missed it
during my first read of HBP.
During Spinner's End, when Snape said he actively contributed to
Sirius' death, I cheered inwardly at what I thought I knew was an
absolute lie, since it proved he was on the Light side. Of course
then he talked about killing Emmeline Vance and that really threw me!
But since then I wonder what exactly was he doing bragging in front
of Narcissa of all people?
Dumbledore told us that Kreacher went to the only person of the
Black family left - Narcissa Malfoy nee Black. So Kreacher goes to
Cissy, tells her about the relationship between Sirius and Harry.
She then conveys this information to Lucius, who subsequently tells
the Dark Lord. After some thinking, Voldemort says "I have a cunning
plan!" and tells Kreacher to keep Sirius out of the way on a certain
day when he will present Harry with a false vision of tortured
Sirius in the DoM.
But in order to do this, he must have told Lucius who told Narcissa
who tells Kreacher. So Narcissa was pretty involved in the lead up
to Sirius death.
So did Snape know all of this? Was he in on it, or did Voldemort
leave him in the dark suspecting his loyalty?
If Snape knew, and passively let things happen the he could claim
involvement in his death in a passive way, yes. But the way he tells
it to Bellatrix it sounds as if he actively provided information to
Voldemort.
I dont take these claims seriously since the only thing he could
have told him about Sirius was his frustration at being cooped up
and his feelings for Harry.
Dumbledore claims that Kreacher passed this information, but now I
wonder about that.
It makes perfect sense for Snape to tell this to LV,
since he had to pass some information on the Order and this would
have seemed trivial. Maybe Dumbledore seeing the furious Harry
already accusing Snape of having a hand in Sirius' death thought
that it would be best for Harry not to know that it was Snape, and
blamed Kreacher.
However this reqires Puppetmaster!Dumbledore and I really dont like
the notion, so while I accept that it is possible, I'm discounting
it for now.
So that leads us to his lying in Spinners End and Narcissa knowing
that Snape was lying. Are they in this together?
Was it a plan to convince Bella and save Draco? Is this possibly
proof for ACID POPS with Narcissa returning those feelings?
(Where, oh where, are ships when you need them?)
But I doubt it. Now, one can say that Narcissa nad Bellatrix *both*
know Snape is lying and are tricking Snape into a UV. True, so far
we have not seen Bellatrix act in a sneaky, cunnning way so far, but
she is a Slytherin right, she must have some of those traits?
So maybe they let that lie slide in order to further the plan of
protecting Draco....but I dont think so somehow.
So I think that Snape lied in Spinners end, Narcissa was completely
aware that he was lying, but since she wanted a lot from him just
then, she allowed it to pass, but she knew that Snape was not really
as loyal as he was making himself out to be.
THIS was the reason she asked for an Unbreakable Vow. She wanted
proof of the man claiming to be on the Dark Side plus help for
Draco, thus killing two birds with one stone.
Just rambling here, since I cant make sense of this part at all and
am completely confused as to this remarkably see-through statement
from an allegedly excellent spy.
(Puzzled) Elyse
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive