Snape and Prophecy and Harry WAS:Re: TBAY: Definitely NOT a Snape Theory (long)
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Mon Dec 26 20:05:04 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 145441
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "dumbledore11214" <dumbledore11214 at y...>
wrote:
> As to your argument that Dumbledore , Sirius and James and Lily
> chose to leave him orphaned, rather than abandon the fight, that it
> is IMO at the least unproven and at the most simply incorrect.
>
> Yes, they did not abandon the fight, but they also were not
> abandoning Harry, IMO. They were protecting Harry and from all those
> people only Lily as we know was ready to die, knowing that Harry may
> be left with nobody. Even James was probably hoping that Harry will
> have Lily.
>
> We have NO conclusive proof, IMO that Dumbledore wanted to die AT
> ALL, on the contrary, I think that Dumbledore would give anything to
> continue helping Harry in his mission and of course I see zero proof
> that Sirius wanted to die, CHOSE to die in MOM, I bet he wanted to
> save Harry and at the end live a long happy life with Harry after
> war. IMO anyway.
>
Pippin:
Of course they wanted to save Harry. But if Voldemort took the
Unbreakable Vow never to harm Harry or anyone who loves him as
long as they or Harry didn't attack him, do you think Sirius, Dumbledore,
James or Lily would have accepted the deal? Would you call them
heroes if they did?
I wouldn't. But we may have to agree to disagree on that.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive