Dumbledore the General
phoenixgod2000
jmrazo at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 7 20:58:42 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 124148
There has been a lot of talk about Dumbledore and what he should/did
do to interfere in Harry's life. But I was thinking the other day
about his larger role as the leader of the Order of the Phoenix. And
it struck me that the Order was losing the last war right up until
Voldemort blasted himself into atoms by attacking the Potters.
So my question is, is Dumbledore really the best person to be
leading this war? The order of the Phoenix independant of the
government and you would think that would give them a lot of leeway
to act since they don't have to act within the law. But Dumbledore
doesn't seem to be doing much in the way of fighting back. He seems
to be running a very passive, reactive war. They know who a large
number of death eaters are but don't seem to do anything to them.
Why not? Even if no one but harry can kill Voldemort, the Order can
still cut the legs out from his support to weaken him it make it
easier for Harry.
I realize that a large part of it is because if DD was winning the
war Harry wouldn't be the hero of the story, but within the confines
of the narrative, why is DD doing such a poor job of prosecuting the
war? He is clearly personally powerful but tactics he uses seem to
be lacking any sort of aggressive push towards the Death Eaters. Is
it simply that he has more honor than his opponents and if so is
that really the person who should be leading it?
I'm anxious to hear your thoughts
phoenixgod2000
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive