Dumbledore the General
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 8 04:07:02 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 124157
Phoenixgod2000:
There has been a lot of talk about Dumbledore and what he should/did
do to interfere in Harry's life. But I was thinking the other day
about his larger role as the leader of the Order of the Phoenix. And
it struck me that the Order was losing the last war right up until
Voldemort blasted himself into atoms by attacking the Potters.
So my question is, is Dumbledore really the best person to be
leading this war? The order of the Phoenix independant of the
government and you would think that would give them a lot of leeway
to act since they don't have to act within the law. But Dumbledore
doesn't seem to be doing much in the way of fighting back. He seems
to be running a very passive, reactive war. They know who a large
number of death eaters are but don't seem to do anything to them.
Why not? Even if no one but harry can kill Voldemort, the Order can
still cut the legs out from his support to weaken him it make it
easier for Harry.
I realize that a large part of it is because if DD was winning the
war Harry wouldn't be the hero of the story, but within the
confines of the narrative, why is DD doing such a poor job of
prosecuting the war? He is clearly personally powerful but tactics
he uses seem to be lacking any sort of aggressive push towards the
Death Eaters. Is it simply that he has more honor than his opponents
and if so is that really the person who should be leading it?
Alla:
As you probably know, I am having A LOT of trouble answering your
question from within the narrative. The fact that JKR needs kids to
be the heroes unfortunately seems to be the most plausible answer.
I suppose, my answer will be UNLESS Dumbledore knows something that
we as readers don't know yet ( meaning that he has specific reasons
for not doing anything or to be more precise not doing anything
active), he is NOT the best person to lead the war.
It is just what you said - Order should be more active and try to
cut Voldemort's support, to make him weaker, NOT just sit around and
wait till Harry will be strong enough to fight with him and
hopefully kill him.
I do NOT consider Dumbledore to be a good general at all with the
facts we had been shown so far, but then again maybe Dumbledore
knows something and unfortunately that something can only be
connected to knowing the future , IMO. Maybe Dumbledore indeed
travels backwards on the timeline or something like that and he
knows that it is better not to interfere too much, if he wants to
escape catastrophe in the future.
And no at this point I don't consider "doing nothing" as being noble
and having more honor than Voldie and Co. The war started and
innocent people ARE getting killed.
On the hand, JKR did say that Dumbledore had a reason not to try
killing Voldie in the battle of MOM....
Just my opinion,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive