Aurors and Unforgiveable Curses
jlnbtr
jlnbtr at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 10 21:42:58 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 124323
bboyminn:
During Voldemort's first reign of terror, Aurors were authorized by
Crouch Sr to use any and all Unforgivable Curses, but I think that
was an emergency authorization. When the immediate emergency ended,
the authorization ended with it. Now, the wizard world and Aurors are
operating under peace-time rules.
...huge snip...
Juli:
I believe what makes an Unforgiveable curse unforgivable and
completly illegal is that its use goes agains ethics, let me try to
explain it a bit.
The three priciples in ethics are: Automony (a person may do what
he/she desires), Well-being (always seeking for the better way to do
things), and justice (equal rights).
Now, the Imperius curse, it makes someone do any number of things
against their will (not autonomy).
Crucio: you just can't do anyone any good by crucioing them (well-
being)
Avada Kevadra: the caster is chosing for the victim his choice of
living or dying and he isn't seeking his well-fare.
I know many other curses and jinxes and charms cause similar efects
but it seems to be that they are limited, they act agains ethics but
only for a short period of time.
Back to Aurors, they are the policemen of the WW, their job is to
keep the world safe, and like cops in a gun shot, wizards in a duel
can be killed, but it all depends the way it is done, we know Moody
has killed quite a number of DEs but I doubt he ever tried to AK
them, they just got killed by any other means. It's the difference
between man slaughter and homicide, completly different. so, I
believe Aurors should not use the Unforgiveables, but they have the
rhight to fight back and if the other wizard dies, well tom bad,
that's it.
Juli
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive