Aurors and Unforgiveable Curses
finwitch
finwitch at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 11 17:11:52 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 124351
>
> Juli:
---
> Back to Aurors, they are the policemen of the WW, their job is to
> keep the world safe, and like cops in a gun shot, wizards in a duel
> can be killed, but it all depends the way it is done, we know Moody
> has killed quite a number of DEs but I doubt he ever tried to AK
> them, they just got killed by any other means. It's the difference
> between man slaughter and homicide, completly different. so, I
> believe Aurors should not use the Unforgiveables, but they have the
> rhight to fight back and if the other wizard dies, well tom bad,
> that's it.
Finwitch:
I agree it's about ethics. Now, it is true that there are situations
where one must kill in order to survive. Mind the law of nature: eat
or be eaten. (I wonder if Dudley misunderstood this and keeps
eating? :) There are even times when death is a relief and welcome.
(Apparently many Azkaban prisoners think so... Better death than a
date with a Dementor)
And I do think that Moody didn't use AK to kill anyone - knife,
poison, Mandrake, transfiguration into a fish on dry land,
strangling...
And - er - there are many ways to manipulate people without Imperio.
They have Veritaserum for getting truth out unwillingly - You can use
Stunning and Mobilicorpus or banishing to get people out of harm's
way - or confundus charm if you need someone to lie...
What I wonder is if Crouch Sr. authorized it just so he could do it
to his son?
As to why I think they're truly unforgivable as curses - I mean, if
we *only* think of what it causes to the victim (loss off free will,
torture, death) the charge is on those - like, you know, murder etc.
Why ban the *method* totally, and in a worse way than the same effect
by any other means?
The clue to that, I believe, is in Bellatrix' taunt to Harry after
the er - intent, choice and/or will of crucio. (Attempt would have
been so that the curse didn't hit the target, and casting would have
been successful).
Righteous anger won't do that. You need to ENJOY doing these curses
if you're to cast them. Taking pleasure on absolute control over
someone, causing pain or killing?
And that -- that's what makes them unforgivable - what they require
to be cast: you can't cast them in self-defence, not even in
righteous anger or in revenge. You can only cast them if you LIKE
that sort of thing. And I suppose they're also quite addictive, like
the Mirror of Erised...
Finwitch
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive