Sexist HP Fans (was: Mother Molly)
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 26 23:00:13 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 125257
>>Casey:
>You know, I've always rolled my eyes when someone says that fandom
(especially slash fandom) is misogynic but now I'm starting to
wonder.<
<snip>
>>Nicky Joe:
>It's very difficult to write good female characters. Even when you
think you've got one down nicely, people will always see her in
different ways.
<snip>
>I don't think it's misogyny, I think it's more that we hold females
to different standards than males. Frankly, males have a lot more
leeway. Females make a wrong move and we have 70 different names for
them, none of them flattering.
Betsy:
But your whole argument is proved wrong by this very group, Nicky
Joe. How much time and energy has been spent arguing over Snape?
And Dumbledore? And Arthur Weasley? And Percy? And Fred and
George? Frankly, I think it's a cop out to cry sexism when folks
start dissecting your favorite character (male or female).
Especially when canon is being used. (And, honestly, there's nothing
more *boring* than a universally loved character. The very fact that
characters are brought up for discussion is a complement to their
well-roundedness, IMO anyway.)
Betsy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive